Re: src/bin/pg_upgrade/t/004_subscription.pl test comment fix

From: Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: src/bin/pg_upgrade/t/004_subscription.pl test comment fix
Date: 2024-01-31 06:18:51
Message-ID: CAHut+PsiW15N6nsC4D5Ey7R9g84-R2eR=hj7+sHz8d6fJA1Fkg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 4:51 PM vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 31 Jan 2024 at 10:27, Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > PSA a small fix for a misleading comment found in the pg_upgrade test code.
>
> Is the double # intentional here, as I did not see this style of
> commenting used elsewhere:
> +# # Upgraded regress_sub1 should still have enabled and failover as true.
> +# # Upgraded regress_sub2 should still have enabled and failover as false.
>

Unintentional caused by copy/paste. Thanks for reporting. I will post
a fixed patch tomorrow.

======
Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Richard Guo 2024-01-31 06:39:59 Re: Oversight in reparameterize_path_by_child leading to executor crash
Previous Message Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) 2024-01-31 06:12:17 RE: Documentation to upgrade logical replication cluster