From: | Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Shubham Khanna <khannashubham1197(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Add support for specifying tables in pg_createsubscriber. |
Date: | 2025-10-08 06:05:14 |
Message-ID: | CAHut+PsYKXKmMSim5FcFo177gosY7a5xgMH_p4AY1_25HMVL7Q@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Shubham,
Another review comment about patch v14...
While reviewing pg_createsubscriber logs, I was surprised to see some
almost duplicate consecutive logs for the pub/slot creation. e.g.
----------
pg_createsubscriber: creating publication "pub2" in database "db2"
pg_createsubscriber: create publication "pub2" in database "db2"
----------
I found the code is doing:
- pg_log_info("creating publication...") unconditionally inside
create_publication
- pg_log_info("create publication...") immediately after call to
create_publication
(patch fragment)
+ create_publication(conn, &dbinfo[i]);
+ pg_log_info("create publication \"%s\" in database \"%s\"",
+ dbinfo[i].pubname, dbinfo[i].dbname);
I think the logging *after* the call is redundant and should be removed.
======
Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Smith | 2025-10-08 06:29:20 | duplicate logging in pg_createsubscriber |
Previous Message | Peter Smith | 2025-10-08 05:40:24 | Re: Add support for specifying tables in pg_createsubscriber. |