Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions

On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 at 12:46 PM Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Please find attached the latest patch set v57*
>
> Differences from v56* are:
>
> * Rebased to HEAD @ today
>
> * Addresses the following feedback issues:
>
> (24) [vc-0305] Done. Ran pgindent for all patch 0001 source files.
>
> (49) [ak-0308] Fixed. In apply_handle_begion_prepare, don't set
> in_remote_transaction if psf spooling
>
> (50) [ak-0308] Fixed. In apply_handle_prepare, assert
> !in_remote_transaction if psf spooling.
>
> (52) [vc-0309] Done. Patch 0002. Simplify the way test 020 creates the
> publication.
>
> (53) [vc-0309] Done. Patch 0002. Simplify the way test 022 creates the
> publication.
>
> -----
> [vc-0305] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CALDaNm1rRG2EUus%2BmFrqRzEshZwJZtxja0rn_n3qXGAygODfOA%40mail.gmail.com
> [vc-0309] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CALDaNm0QuncAis5OqtjzOxAPTZRn545JLqfjFEJwyRjUH-XvEw%40mail.gmail.com
> [ak-0308] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAA4eK1%2BoSUU77T92FueDJWsp%3DFjTroNaNC-K45Dgdr7f18aBFA%40mail.gmail.com
>
> Kind Regards,
> Peter Smith.
> Fujitsu Australia

Oops. I posted the wrong patch set in my previous email.

Here are the correct ones for v57*.

Sorry for any confusion.