Re: row filtering for logical replication

From: Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>
Cc: "tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Euler Taveira <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com>, Greg Nancarrow <gregn4422(at)gmail(dot)com>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ajin Cherian <itsajin(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Rahila Syed <rahilasyed90(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Önder Kalacı <onderkalaci(at)gmail(dot)com>, japin <japinli(at)hotmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: row filtering for logical replication
Date: 2022-01-05 22:29:40
Message-ID: CAHut+PsMiZjdDGggAtfxcjd7fmHb6QW11UVEtUJDe=fWEbkpeg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

FYI - v58 is currently known to be broken due to a recent commit [1].

I plan to post a v59* later today to address this as well as other
recent review comments.

------
[1] https://github.com/postgres/postgres/commit/6ce16088bfed97f982f66a9dc17b8364df289e4d

Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bossart, Nathan 2022-01-05 23:10:50 Re: archive modules
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2022-01-05 22:27:45 Re: a misbehavior of partition row movement (?)