Re: Logical Replication - revisit `is_table_publication` function implementation

From: Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Logical Replication - revisit `is_table_publication` function implementation
Date: 2026-05-18 04:49:08
Message-ID: CAHut+PsHUQYXHYJLEYMFTmtw7aV67MMgV+ey-3b-4kX+agYozA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

This patch had received positive feedback in the last post, but the
thread has been inactive for about 5 weeks. What can I do to help get
this pushed?

======
Kind Regards
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Smith 2026-05-18 05:26:41 Re: Redundant/mis-use of _(x) gettext macro?
Previous Message Тестова Екатерина 2026-05-18 04:20:55 VACUUM FULL or CREATE INDEX fails with error: missing chunk number 0 for toast value XXX