Re: Logical Replication - revisit `is_table_publication` function implementation

From: Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Bingshuai Li <lucian1412(at)outlook(dot)com>
Cc: vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Logical Replication - revisit `is_table_publication` function implementation
Date: 2026-08-19 06:19:38
Message-ID: CAHut+Ps58uPVcfg-j9Mbnp+TSsh8hCerq1rWC0TiS58ktefZSQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Aug 18, 2026 at 5:48 PM Bingshuai Li <lucian1412(at)outlook(dot)com> wrote:

Thanks for your review.

PSA patch v3 which has modified the comments as suggested.

> Process note: this patch currently has two CommitFest entries, #6705 and
> #7042, both "Needs review" in PG20-2. Could you close one of them so
> review activity lands in a single place?
>

Thanks for reporting the CF duplicate. I've "withdrawn" one of them.

======
Kind Regards,
Peter Smith.
Fujitsu Australia

Attachment Content-Type Size
v3-0001-rewrite-is_table_publication.patch application/octet-stream 5.4 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Masahiko Sawada 2026-08-19 06:25:00 Re: [PATCH] Fix NULL dereference in subscription REFRESH on concurrent DROP
Previous Message Fujii Masao 2026-08-19 06:05:51 Re: Fix small psql slash option leaks