From: | Flo Rance <trourance(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Thomas Güttler <guettliml(at)thomas-guettler(dot)de> |
Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Profile what the production server is doing |
Date: | 2018-07-25 09:49:51 |
Message-ID: | CAHogYcXvN8hs_Y8+Umzc2dD9G6hJwB80QrYc9jezckJa63CE7w@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
As you already open an issue on their website regarding this point, you
should maybe wait for them to answer.
As far as I know, it's still used by some companies in production.
Flo
On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 11:39 AM, Thomas Güttler <
guettliml(at)thomas-guettler(dot)de> wrote:
>
>
> Am 23.07.2018 um 17:16 schrieb Flo Rance:
>
>> pgobserver might do that as well, particulary useful for functions
>> performances.
>>
>> https://github.com/zalando/PGObserver
>>
>>
>
> Thank you for pointing me to this.
>
> After googling for "PGObserver powa" I found nice collection of current
> tools:
>
> https://www.quora.com/What-are-the-best-graphical-Monitorin
> g-tools-for-Postgresql
>
> BTW, PGObserver seems a bit dated. There are only very few updates during
> the last months.
> Is there an successor?
>
> Regards,
> Thomas
>
> --
> Thomas Guettler http://www.thomas-guettler.de/
> I am looking for feedback: https://github.com/guettli/pro
> gramming-guidelines
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Julien Rouhaud | 2018-07-25 10:25:49 | Re: Profile what the production server is doing |
Previous Message | Thomas Güttler | 2018-07-25 09:39:14 | Re: Profile what the production server is doing |