Re: [PATCH] Implement INSERT SET syntax

From: Gareth Palmer <gareth(at)internetnz(dot)net(dot)nz>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Vik Fearing <vik(dot)fearing(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Implement INSERT SET syntax
Date: 2019-12-03 09:44:23
Message-ID: CAHiETSu=n+EdhTXnN_sy_=TvZ5he-v-fBdw9uNiLVPAsk=dbTg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Dec 1, 2019 at 4:32 PM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 12:24:15PM +1300, Gareth Palmer wrote:
> > Attached is an updated patch with for_locking_clause added, test-cases
> > re-use existing tables and the comments and documentation have been
> > expanded.
>
> Per the automatic patch tester, documentation included in the patch
> does not build. Could you please fix that? I have moved the patch to
> next CF, waiting on author.

Attached is a fixed version.

> --
> Michael

Attachment Content-Type Size
insert-set-v5.patch text/x-diff 15.6 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Konstantin Knizhnik 2019-12-03 09:58:24 Re: Yet another vectorized engine
Previous Message Alexey Kondratov 2019-12-03 09:41:13 Re: [Patch] pg_rewind: options to use restore_command from recovery.conf or command line