Re: [PATCH] Implement INSERT SET syntax

From: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
To: Gareth Palmer <gareth(at)internetnz(dot)net(dot)nz>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Vik Fearing <vik(dot)fearing(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Implement INSERT SET syntax
Date: 2020-03-24 17:00:03
Message-ID: 91a99ce4-1d7c-9610-a752-b7dd4fab8c1b@pgmasters.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi Tom,

On 12/3/19 4:44 AM, Gareth Palmer wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 1, 2019 at 4:32 PM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 12:24:15PM +1300, Gareth Palmer wrote:
>>> Attached is an updated patch with for_locking_clause added, test-cases
>>> re-use existing tables and the comments and documentation have been
>>> expanded.
>>
>> Per the automatic patch tester, documentation included in the patch
>> does not build. Could you please fix that? I have moved the patch to
>> next CF, waiting on author.
>
> Attached is a fixed version.

Does this version of the patch address your concerns?

Regards,
--
-David
david(at)pgmasters(dot)net

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2020-03-24 17:00:38 Re: backup manifests
Previous Message Dmitry Dolgov 2020-03-24 16:42:21 Re: Index Skip Scan