Re: Add CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS in pg_buffercache_pages while scanning the buffers

From: SATYANARAYANA NARLAPURAM <satyanarlapuram(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Add CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS in pg_buffercache_pages while scanning the buffers
Date: 2025-08-15 09:33:40
Message-ID: CAHg+QDdzoHvfr4N7PcQ4Ph+nBYa9skMeMx3g=Nocym5JYWLRSg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi Masahiko,

On Thu, Aug 14, 2025 at 4:57 PM Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:

> On Fri, Aug 8, 2025 at 2:59 PM Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 31, 2025 at 4:31 PM SATYANARAYANA NARLAPURAM
> > <satyanarlapuram(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Please find attached patch that adds CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS while
> scanning the buffers in pg_buffercache_pages. I checked other functions in
> the module and this check already exists in pg_buffercache_numa_pages.
> >
> > Thank you for the patch!
> >
> > I think the patch is reasonable and it looks good to me. I'll push it
> > to master early next week, barring objections.
>
> After reviewing this patch more, I'm leaning toward to backpatch this
> change. The patch adds CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() to
> pg_buffercache_pages(), pg_buffercache_summary(), and
> pg_buffercache_usage_counts(), and the latter two functions were
> introduced in v16. Therefore, for v15 or older we can add CFI to only
> pg_buffercache_pages() and apply this patch to v16 or newer. Thoughts?
>

Thanks for reviewing the patch. Sounds good to me.

Thanks,
Satya

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nazir Bilal Yavuz 2025-08-15 10:20:36 Re: Increase OpenBSD CI task's RAM disk size
Previous Message David Rowley 2025-08-15 09:19:27 Re: Compilation issues for HASH_STATISTICS and HASH_DEBUG options