| From: | Tender Wang <tndrwang(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Richard Guo <guofenglinux(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, Jacob Brazeal <jacob(dot)brazeal(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: remove_useless_joins vs. bug #19560 |
| Date: | 2026-07-28 13:03:51 |
| Message-ID: | CAHewXNnOCHC=uj7gaUfiOww_gmoqvg=JtrxrVkDNfCnJ36wh6w@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Tom,
Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> 于2026年7月28日周二 20:24写道:
>
> Tender Wang <tndrwang(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > I think this issue is still worth fixing. The discussion in [1] has
> > been inactive for about two months, so I wanted to ask whether you
> > intend to address it as part of the analyzejoins.c rewrite, or whether
> > it would be better for me to resume work on [1] once the rewrite has
> > been committed.
>
> I disagree. That's not a bug -- okay, it's a missed optimization for
> a small class of poorly-written queries -- and it's not specific to
> SJE either. I think far too much development effort has been spent
> on the point already. See my upthread reply to Richard [1].
>
Thanks for the explanation.
I'm not sure why I couldn't see your reply to Richard in my Gmail
inbox, although I can see it on the pgsql-hackers archive.
Anyway, thanks for the clarification, and sorry for raising a point
that had already been discussed.
--
Thanks,
Tender Wang
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Burd | 2026-07-28 13:10:54 | Don't use __builtin_setjmp on aarch64 MinGW/Windows |
| Previous Message | Shlok Kyal | 2026-07-28 13:03:08 | Re: Bug in ALTER SUBSCRIPTION ... SERVER / ... CONNECTION with broken old server |