Re: More partition pruning bugs with multi-column RANGE partitions

From: Tender Wang <tndrwang(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Ayush Tiwari <ayushtiwari(dot)slg01(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: More partition pruning bugs with multi-column RANGE partitions
Date: 2026-08-27 01:24:31
Message-ID: CAHewXNmPMbt=C66QPs7HWcm+46VU3n3Z184kcVHRVZtV2vp_Aw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> 于2026年8月26日周三 20:41写道：
>
> Then made the code adjustments and ran the same again into another
> output file and compared with my diff tool. The first difference it
> highlighted was a greater-than query that didn't prune one partition
> that it could have. I included that as a regression test.
>

The v2 LGTM.

--
Thanks,
Tender Wang

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bertrand Drouvot 2026-08-27 01:30:11 Re: Persist slot invalidations before publishing them
Previous Message dbryan.green 2026-08-27 01:04:15 Re: COPY FROM with RLS