Re: Remove an unnecessary check on semijoin_target_ok() on postgres_fdw.c

From: Tender Wang <tndrwang(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alexander Pyhalov <a(dot)pyhalov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Remove an unnecessary check on semijoin_target_ok() on postgres_fdw.c
Date: 2024-11-29 01:39:14
Message-ID: CAHewXNm4wRx9yF=pJf=t6xscuLJCUhNsGnAEKqRW7KZMyq=NAA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alexander Pyhalov <a(dot)pyhalov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> 于2024年11月29日周五 00:02写道:

> Tender Wang писал(а) 2024-10-09 10:26:
> > Hi,
> > When I debug FDW join pushdown codes, I found below codes in
> > semijoin_target_ok():
> > if (bms_is_member(var->varno, innerrel->relids) &&
> >
> > !bms_is_member(var->varno, outerrel->relids))
> >
> > As far as I know, if a var belongs to the innerrel of joinrel, it's
> > not possible that it
> > may belong to the outerrel. So if the bms_is_member(var->varno,
> > innerrel->relids)
> > returns TRUE, then !bms_is_member(var->varno, outerrel->relids) must
> > be TRUE.
> > If bms_is_member(var->varno, innerrel->relids) returns FALSE,
> > !bms_is_member(var->varno, outerrel->relids) will not execute due to
> > short circuit.
> >
> > So I think we can remove the "!bms_is_member(var->varno,
> > outerrel->relids)" from if.
> > Any thoughts?
>
> Hi.
> Seems good to me.
> --
> Best regards,
> Alexander Pyhalov,
> Postgres Professional
>

Thanks for looking at that.

--
Thanks,
Tender Wang

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2024-11-29 01:42:47 Re: Changing shared_buffers without restart
Previous Message jian he 2024-11-29 01:26:19 Re: Remove useless GROUP BY columns considering unique index