From: | Tender Wang <tndrwang(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Use opresulttype instead of calling SearchSysCache1() in match_orclause_to_indexcol() |
Date: | 2025-10-18 03:12:12 |
Message-ID: | CAHewXN=z4E7btYvNA5AM32Kuzm8bfrh5D1tz10mz_y7nbB_vPg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> 于2025年9月20日周六 00:16写道:
> Tender Wang <tndrwang(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > While working on another issue, I stepped into
> match_orclause_to_indexcol().
> > I found below codes:
>
> > /* Only the operator returning a boolean suit the transformation. */
> > if (get_op_rettype(opno) != BOOLOID)
> > break;
>
> I don't understand what purpose this check serves at all.
> We are looking at an arm of an OR clause, so it had better
> yield boolean.
>
Yeah, this check doesn't need any more. I removed this check in the
attached patch.
In match_index_to_operand(), the indexExpr has been ignored, so I removed
below check, too.
- if (IsA(indexExpr, RelabelType))
- indexExpr = (Node *) ((RelabelType *) indexExpr)->arg;
> If anything, this is actively wrong, because for example it'd
> reject a polymorphic operator that yields boolean in-context.
>
> In general, this code looks like a mess. There are a lot of
> Asserts that might be okay in development but probably should
> not have got committed, and the comments need work.
>
These assertions were removed by me, too.
I didn’t modify these code comments since English isn’t my native language,
and I’d appreciate your help with them.
--
Thanks,
Tender Wang
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
0001-Remove-some-asserts.patch | application/octet-stream | 2.6 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Philip Alger | 2025-10-18 04:08:13 | Re: [PATCH] Add pg_get_trigger_ddl() to retrieve the CREATE TRIGGER statement |
Previous Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2025-10-18 01:24:26 | Re: Logical Replication of sequences |