| From: | Juan Rodrigo Alejandro Burgos Mella <rodrigoburgosmella(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Pierre Forstmann <pierre(dot)forstmann(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: LISTAGG à la Oracle in PostgreSQL |
| Date: | 2026-03-10 08:45:27 |
| Message-ID: | CAHbZ42wBt2-C6i3520QDbURpiTooD5AWmK6s3qkFnzFPJxSZLg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Pierre
The equivalent in PostgreSQL is through:
SELECT deptno,
STRING_AGG(ename, ',' ORDER BY ename) AS employeesFROM empGROUP
BY deptnoORDER BY deptno;
Atte
JRBM
El lun, 9 mar 2026 a las 15:21, Pierre Forstmann (<
pierre(dot)forstmann(at)gmail(dot)com>) escribió:
> Hello,
>
> I can write a LISTAGG aggregate for:
>
> create table emp(deptno numeric, ename text);
>
> SELECT deptno, LISTAGG(ename, ','::text ORDER BY ename) AS employees
> FROM emp GROUP BY deptno ORDER BY deptno;
>
> I would like to know if is possible to create an aggregate LISTAGG that
> would work like in Oracle:
>
> SELECT deptno,
> listagg(ename, ',') WITHIN GROUP (ORDER BY ename) AS employees
> FROM emp
> GROUP BY deptno
> ORDER BY deptno;
>
> I failed and IA also failed. Claude says:
>
> It is not possible to exactly replicate listagg(ename, ',') WITHIN GROUP
> (ORDER BY ename) as a custom PostgreSQL aggregate
> because PostgreSQL strictly forbids ungrouped columns as direct
> arguments to ordered-set aggregates.
>
> Do you agree ?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Sabino Mullane | 2026-03-10 14:15:01 | Re: Index (primary key) corrupt? |
| Previous Message | Paul A Jungwirth | 2026-03-09 22:05:17 | Re: LISTAGG à la Oracle in PostgreSQL |