| From: | Maciek Sakrejda <msakrejda(at)truviso(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>, Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com>, Andreas Joseph Krogh <andreak(at)officenet(dot)no>, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: GIT move |
| Date: | 2012-02-08 06:39:46 |
| Message-ID: | CAH_hXRb5fp9S_nfKkQ5za43XqP-DQuo-9nynXeMOtMnKY4o0xg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
>> As far as I
>> can tell, the reason the main project requires patches was to change
>> the *process* as little as possible in the course of changing the VCS
>> plumbing.
>
> That's *a* reason, but not the only one. Other large considerations are
> that we consider that the act of submitting the patch to the mailing
> list is evidence of intent to license the code under the Postgres
> license, and further that this evidence is archived in the PG list
> archives.
That's an excellent point--thanks for the clarification.
---
Maciek Sakrejda | System Architect | Truviso
1065 E. Hillsdale Blvd., Suite 215
Foster City, CA 94404
(650) 242-3500 Main
www.truviso.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Cramer | 2012-02-08 12:27:45 | Re: GIT move |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2012-02-08 03:34:34 | Re: GIT move |