Re: Max connections reached without max connections reached

From: Michael Lewis <mlewis(at)entrata(dot)com>
To: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: James Sewell <james(dot)sewell(at)jirotech(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Max connections reached without max connections reached
Date: 2021-12-02 04:10:16
Message-ID: CAHOFxGpyje7jehK-AJC9TY-uh42niYugnbodZ4t5uPFksTJ_qQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wed, Dec 1, 2021 at 9:06 PM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> IMHO, it is good to LOG such information if we are not already logging
> this anywhere.
>

+1

I expect my 'vote' counts for naught, but I fully expect seeing these show
up in the logs would have helped me much more quickly have insight into
what was going on during times of very high concurrency and extreme
slowness with many processes showing as waiting on LwLocks.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Lewis 2021-12-02 04:20:56 Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT doesn't work
Previous Message Michael Lewis 2021-12-02 04:07:11 Re: Max connections reached without max connections reached