Re: AWS forcing PG upgrade from v9.6 a disaster

From: Michael Lewis <mlewis(at)entrata(dot)com>
To: Ryan Bair <ryandbair(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Dean Gibson (DB Administrator)" <postgresql(at)mailpen(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Pgsql Performance <pgsql-performance(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, lance(at)illinois(dot)edu
Subject: Re: AWS forcing PG upgrade from v9.6 a disaster
Date: 2021-05-28 20:11:09
Message-ID: CAHOFxGpjKvU4=JVxeVf=x9U+8iO-R9DHOMSwfHq+GMnXfpD1Xg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance

The plan is also influenced by cost related and memory related config
settings such as random_page_cost and work_mem, right? Hence the questions
if configs are matching or newer versions are using very conservative
(default) settings.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jan Wieck 2021-05-28 20:23:06 Re: AWS forcing PG upgrade from v9.6 a disaster
Previous Message Ryan Bair 2021-05-28 19:39:23 Re: AWS forcing PG upgrade from v9.6 a disaster

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jan Wieck 2021-05-28 20:23:06 Re: AWS forcing PG upgrade from v9.6 a disaster
Previous Message Ryan Bair 2021-05-28 19:39:23 Re: AWS forcing PG upgrade from v9.6 a disaster