Re: Proposal: Incremental Backup

From: Gabriele Bartolini <gabriele(dot)bartolini(at)2ndquadrant(dot)it>
To: Claudio Freire <klaussfreire(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Marco Nenciarini <marco(dot)nenciarini(at)2ndquadrant(dot)it>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, desmodemone <desmodemone(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Proposal: Incremental Backup
Date: 2014-08-12 14:17:30
Message-ID: CAHNtfO60_gPxw+UjpwUEO2ZOXimaa-2iXCgWst00tWa1fzPV2Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi Claudio,

2014-08-12 15:25 GMT+02:00 Claudio Freire <klaussfreire(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> Still not safe. Checksum collisions do happen, especially in big data sets.

Can I ask you what you are currently using for backing up large data
sets with Postgres?

Thanks,
Gabriele

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Marco Nenciarini 2014-08-12 14:25:38 Re: Proposal: Incremental Backup
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2014-08-12 13:28:29 Re: PL/PgSQL: RAISE and the number of parameters