Re: [PATCH] GROUP BY ALL

On Fri, Sep 26, 2025 at 9:12 AM Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>
> Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> writes:
> > The initially proposed patch appears to have the right idea overall.
> > But it does not handle more complex cases like
> > SELECT a, SUM(b)+a FROM t1 GROUP BY ALL;
>
> > (For explanation: GROUP BY ALL expands to all select list entries that
> > do not contain aggregates. So the above would expand to
> > SELECT a, SUM(b)+a FROM t1 GROUP BY a;
> > which should then be rejected based on the existing rules.)
>
> I thought I understood this definition, up till your last
> comment. What's invalid about that expanded query?
>
> regression=# create table t1 (a int, b int);
> CREATE TABLE
> regression=# SELECT a, SUM(b)+a FROM t1 GROUP BY a;
> a | ?column?
> ---+----------
> (0 rows)

Agreed that this shouldn't be an error; added a similar test case to
v2 of this patch.

David