Re: Inaccuracy in wal_receiver_status_interval parameter description

From: Dmitriy Kuzmin <kuzmin(dot)db4(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Euler Taveira <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com>, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Inaccuracy in wal_receiver_status_interval parameter description
Date: 2021-02-24 13:16:57
Message-ID: CAHLDt=_a7=vGJRcSgLY57_bVFrtBnH6ieXwJ1WeXiZR1c0f5aw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

Thanks.

Will this change be made in the documentation for all Postgresql versions?

Best regards,
Dmitriy Kuzmin

ср, 24 февр. 2021 г. в 12:19, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>:

> On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 09:21:41PM -0300, Euler Taveira wrote:
> > LGTM.
>
> Thanks, applied.
> --
> Michael
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2021-02-25 02:41:47 Re: Inaccuracy in wal_receiver_status_interval parameter description
Previous Message Fujii Masao 2021-02-24 11:15:59 Re: incoorect restore_command