Re: [BUG?] lag of minRecoveryPont in archive recovery

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>
Cc: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [BUG?] lag of minRecoveryPont in archive recovery
Date: 2012-12-12 15:36:48
Message-ID: CAHGQGwHuqQ9pKuYd=dvE3iCcW2LP=Hs0ZPX01ztBu5yb0TOfZg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 2:03 AM, Heikki Linnakangas
<hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com> wrote:
> On 11.12.2012 17:04, Fujii Masao wrote:
>>
>> The patch looks good. I confirmed that the PANIC error didn't happen,
>> with the patch.
>
>
> Ok, committed, and also moved the CheckRecoveryConsistency call. Please take
> a look to double-check that I didn't miss anything.

Looks good to me. Thanks a lot!

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2012-12-12 15:37:00 Re: Re: bulk_multi_insert infinite loops with large rows and small fill factors
Previous Message Karl O. Pinc 2012-12-12 15:14:51 Re: Multiple --table options for other commands