From: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: somewhat wrong archive_command example |
Date: | 2011-09-21 01:58:31 |
Message-ID: | CAHGQGwHnVtdeaTKSx+JwC3JKsgkNUH0cyJi4QXBV+3tRw4Tdjg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 10:34 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 15:17, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
>> At
>> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/continuous-archiving.html
>> we say
>>
>> """
>> Many people choose to use scripts to define their archive_command, so
>> that their postgresql.conf entry looks very simple:
>>
>> archive_command = 'local_backup_script.sh'
>> """
>>
>> It seems to me, however, that even a simple archive_command like that
>> ought to contain at least %p, right?
>
> Should always need both %p and %f, no?
Yes unless the script extracts the file name from the path given as %p.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Greg Smith | 2011-09-21 02:45:09 | Re: somewhat wrong archive_command example |
Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2011-09-20 13:34:06 | Re: somewhat wrong archive_command example |