Re: [PATCH] pg_isready (was: [WIP] pg_ping utility)

On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 2:14 AM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Sorry for the delay in responding to you.
>
> On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 6:03 AM, Phil Sorber <phil(at)omniti(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 1:07 PM, Phil Sorber <phil(at)omniti(dot)com> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 12:46 PM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>>> No maybe. But I think that all the client commands should follow the
>>>> same rule. Otherwise a user would get confused when specifying
>>>> options.
>>>
>>> I would consider the rest of the apps using it as a consensus. I will
>>> make sure it aligns in behavior.
>>>
>>
>> I've done as you suggested, and made sure they align with other
>> command line utils. What I have found is that dbname is passed
>> (almost) last in the param array so that it clobbers all previous
>> values. I have made this patch as minimal as possible basing it off of
>> master and not off of my previous attempt. For the record I still like
>> the overall design of my previous attempt better, but I have not
>> included a new version based on that here so as not to confuse the
>> issue, however I would gladly do so upon request.
>>
>> Updated patch attached.
>
> Thanks! The patch basically looks good to me.
>
> I updated the patch against current master and fixed some problems:
>
> - Handle the hostaddr in the connection string properly.
> - Remove the character 'V' from the third argument of getopt_long().
> - Handle the error cases of PQconninfoParse() and PQconndefaults().
> - etc...
>
> Please see the attached patch.

Committed.

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao