Re: 030_pg_recvlogical fails because the same PID is assigned

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>
Cc: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 030_pg_recvlogical fails because the same PID is assigned
Date: 2026-08-07 03:42:41
Message-ID: CAHGQGwHbtFfKUKQKQTGOJ1n_TOfpLL_8B5SX19K-0qUS+yArdQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Aug 6, 2026 at 2:24 PM Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)
<kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com> wrote:
> Another way is to check the start position specified by the START_REPLICATION is
> advanced, but your approach seems better. PSA new version.

Thanks for updating the patch!

I made a few minor cosmetic changes and pushed the updated patch.

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) 2026-08-07 04:00:14 RE: 030_pg_recvlogical fails because the same PID is assigned
Previous Message jian he 2026-08-07 03:41:30 Re: MERGE/SPLIT PARTITIONS issues/questions