Re: Speedup of relation deletes during recovery

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Speedup of relation deletes during recovery
Date: 2018-06-18 18:13:47
Message-ID: CAHGQGwHTvE_uBeYisE+Gd_dUx5RZpOPk=9_v-VQPvA4azY59dg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Jun 16, 2018 at 2:54 AM, Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru> wrote:
>> We just had a customer hit this issue. I kind of wonder whether this
>> shouldn't be backpatched: Currently the execution on the primary is
>> O(NBuffers * log(ndrels)) whereas it's O(NBuffers * ndrels) on the
>> standby - with a lot higher constants to boot. That means it's very
>> easy to get into situations where the standy starts to lag behind very
>> significantly.
>
> +1, we faced with that too

+1 to back-patch. As Horiguchi-san pointed out, this is basically
the fix for oversight of commit 279628a0a7, not new feature.

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dent John 2018-06-18 18:38:13 Re: Query Rewrite for Materialized Views (Postgres Extension)
Previous Message Fujii Masao 2018-06-18 18:06:54 Re: Speedup of relation deletes during recovery