Re: Proposal for changes to recovery.conf API

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Proposal for changes to recovery.conf API
Date: 2017-01-11 09:53:02
Message-ID: CAHGQGwHRmS9ndxNU1bUR4rNtR9tNWbC0Veq6-b_fn0WExN+e=Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 4:50 AM, Peter Eisentraut
<peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On 1/1/17 4:14 PM, Simon Riggs wrote:
>> OK, so here's the patch, plus doc cleanup patch.
>
> I don't think this patch is likely to succeed if we throw in more ideas
> in every round.
>
> I think we have or are approaching agreement on moving recovery.conf
> into postgresql.conf, making the settings reloadable, and adding signal
> (formerly trigger) files to trigger recovery or standby. I think that
> is a useful change, but it's already big enough and needs extensive
> reviewing and testing.

Agreed. It's better to focus on the "core" part of the patch firstly.

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Etsuro Fujita 2017-01-11 10:00:52 Re: postgres_fdw bug in 9.6
Previous Message Fujii Masao 2017-01-11 09:51:30 Re: Proposal for changes to recovery.conf API