| From: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Stabilize 026_overwrite_contrecord test |
| Date: | 2026-09-04 14:02:44 |
| Message-ID: | CAHGQGwHKLDS-F+tsJK6HMUB4OTtAiGEhL+qXSweBXdC6XcQZLg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Sep 4, 2026 at 2:00 AM Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> 03.09.2026 03:33, Michael Paquier wrote:
> Yes, this failure is also something that was puzzling me a bit, but I
> did not take the time to dig into it. Enforcing a larger checkpoint
> timeout sounds like a safety measure good enough, at quick glance.
Thanks!
> where all such failures are enumerated with links to corresponding
> reports/discussions, e.g. I reported this one previously:
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/9ffdb19a-7a89-424e-925a-dd981c37f0ba%40gmail.com
Thanks for the pointer!
Reading your previous report, my understanding is that the failure was
also caused by a checkpoint during the test. So the proposed fix, which
increases checkpoint_timeout to prevent such checkpoints,
seems consistent with that analysis.
So, barring any objections, I'll commit the patch.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrei Lepikhov | 2026-09-04 14:06:02 | Make the transition state of avg(int2)/avg(int4)/sum(int2)/sum(int4) internal |
| Previous Message | Jan Nidzwetzki | 2026-09-04 13:51:06 | Re: Re:[PATCH] Speed up repeat() for larger counts |