| From: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Renaming of pg_xlog and pg_clog |
| Date: | 2016-08-26 03:58:14 |
| Message-ID: | CAHGQGwHK2yimfLvG_WQ1Vrq2h+CMzgv5u6OEmxr-cbJRO+WKWQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 11:55 AM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 11:39:29AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> Now, one of the things discussed as well was that we may want to still
>> keep pg_xlog, and soft-link to pg_journal or whatever-the-new-name is
>> to not break the existing tools. Personally, I'd prefer a hard break.
>> That would not be complicated to fix for any tool maintainers.
>
> I agree on a hard break, unless we get pushback from users, and even
> then, they can create the symlinks themselves.
I strongly prefer symlink approach not to break many existing tools
and scripts.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2016-08-26 04:07:09 | Re: increasing the default WAL segment size |
| Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2016-08-26 03:54:29 | Re: increasing the default WAL segment size |