Re: [PATCH] Doc fix for autovacuum_max_parallel_workers

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Baji Shaik <baji(dot)pgdev(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Sami Imseih <samimseih(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Doc fix for autovacuum_max_parallel_workers
Date: 2026-10-15 23:34:42
Message-ID: CAHGQGwH3JrgcoWuCApBZRtCsuphO9Fz=p7viScXhLz2ZbsnLvA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Oct 16, 2026 at 7:01 AM Baji Shaik <baji(dot)pgdev(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> v3 updated with the recommendation.

+ line; but the setting can be overridden for individual tables by

"overridden" should be "reduced" here? IIUC, this GUC remains an upper limit
even when the table storage parameter is set, so the table parameter can
lower the limit but cannot raise it. Both autovacuum_freeze_max_age and
autovacuum_multixact_freeze_max_age seem to use "reduced" for the same
reason.

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2026-10-15 23:44:45 Re: Revert libpq servicefile connection option in v19 (info leak and uninterruptible backend DoS)
Previous Message Sehrope Sarkuni 2026-10-15 23:17:18 Revert libpq servicefile connection option in v19 (info leak and uninterruptible backend DoS)