Re: Failing assertion while taking a restartpoint during crash recovery

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Imran Zaheer <imran(dot)zhir(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Failing assertion while taking a restartpoint during crash recovery
Date: 2026-09-01 02:48:59
Message-ID: CAHGQGwH+J4qGfp+Rzk2Nh8jmMawr=qyyVvGPhY7QirEArCn3zQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Aug 20, 2026 at 12:58 AM Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> For a bug fix in stable branches, I would prefer to keep the change as
> small as possible. Also, subtrans.c says that there are no XLOG
> interactions, so having it update shared recovery state in
> xlogrecovery.c feels a bit odd to me. I therefore prefer the current
> patch and approach.

There don't seem to be any further comments on the latest patch.
So, barring any objections, I'll commit it.

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message xliu19163 2026-09-01 03:00:35 Re: Many of psql's describe functions bloat cache / waste mem
Previous Message Ewan Young 2026-09-01 02:34:38 Re: GRAPH_TABLE pattern WHERE clause is not coerced to boolean