Re: Standby accepts recovery_target_timeline setting?

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Standby accepts recovery_target_timeline setting?
Date: 2019-09-26 09:55:53
Message-ID: CAHGQGwGtcACSEN3rxcTUsKBGxJUrVqKQoq1icvzRMGLi=91BhA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 5:22 AM David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> wrote:
>
> While testing against PG12 I noticed the documentation states that
> recovery targets are not valid when standby.signal is present.

Or that description in the doc is not true? Other recovery target
parameters seem to take effect even when standby.signal exists.

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christoph Berg 2019-09-26 11:04:26 Unstable select_parallel regression output in 12rc1
Previous Message Youki Shiraishi 2019-09-26 09:32:18 Re: Add comments for a postgres program in bootstrap mode