Re: Checkpoint replication slots later

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Ants Aasma <ants(dot)aasma(at)cybertec(dot)at>
Cc: Hüseyin Demir <huseyin(dot)d3r(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Checkpoint replication slots later
Date: 2026-08-04 08:13:59
Message-ID: CAHGQGwGXfprAnVnt5NjF-bQ6wtEYkdot78ePFJ5Hy4S4OHKpyA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Aug 4, 2026 at 3:50 PM Ants Aasma <ants(dot)aasma(at)cybertec(dot)at> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 4 Aug 2026 at 08:19, Hüseyin Demir <huseyin(dot)d3r(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> No objections from my side, thanks in advance!
>
>
> Looks good to me too. Big thank you for keeping it up to date.

I've pushed the patch. Thanks!

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ayush Tiwari 2026-08-04 08:16:51 Re: Add a pg_wal_preallocate() SQL function to eagerly create future WAL segments
Previous Message Neil Chen 2026-08-04 08:13:42 Re: [PATCH] Fix vacuum_delay_point happening inside lock