Re: primary_conninfo missing from pg_stat_wal_receiver

On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 4:43 AM, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
> All,
>
> * Alvaro Herrera (alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com) wrote:
>> Michael Paquier wrote:
>> > On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 7:34 PM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> > > I have one question; why do we call the column "conn_info" instead of
>> > > "conninfo" which is basically used in other places? "conninfo" is better to me.
>> >
>> > No real reason for one or the other to be honest. If you want to
>> > change it you could just apply the attached.
>>
>> I was of two minds myself, and found no reason to change conn_info, so I
>> decided to keep what was submitted. If you want to change it, I'm not
>> opposed.
>>
>> Don't forget to bump catversion.
>
> 'conninfo' certainly seems to be more commonly used and I believe is
> what was agreed to up-thread.

+1. So since no one objects to change the column name,
I applied Michael's patch. Thanks!

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao