Re: pg_stats_recovery view

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_stats_recovery view
Date: 2012-02-02 02:18:08
Message-ID: CAHGQGwG9WFnOMbQ8pa81BN4CQinKgsmVN4TjtH-_aXGiV0X5CQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 6:01 AM, Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 4:03 AM, Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de> wrote:
>>
>>
>> --On 15. Januar 2012 02:50:00 -0500 Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Attached is a patch thats implements a pg_stat_recovery view that
>>> keeps counters about processed wal records. I just notice that it
>>> still lacks documentation but i will add it during the week.
>>
>>
>> Hi Jaime,
>>
>> do you have an updated patch? The current v1 patch doesn't apply cleanly
>> anymore, and before i go and rebase the patch i thought i'm asking...
>>
>
> here's the patch rebased to this morning's HEAD

Before reviewing the patch, I'd like to know: what's the purpose of this view?
It's only debug purpose? ISTM that most users don't care about this view at all.

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Shigeru Hanada 2012-02-02 02:32:03 Re: pgsql_fdw, FDW for PostgreSQL server
Previous Message Ashutosh Bapat 2012-02-02 01:56:18 Re: Confusing EXPLAIN output in case of inherited tables