From: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Euler Taveira <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Make pgoutput documentation easier to find |
Date: | 2025-08-08 15:26:02 |
Message-ID: | CAHGQGwG0zPyz0BqY5sR2y4OpTWQu9Sb2POH76wzG8_K-AJ72dQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Aug 7, 2025 at 10:35 PM Euler Taveira <euler(at)eulerto(dot)com> wrote:
> Since you are proposing this change, I'm wondering if we shouldn't move
> "Writing Logical Decoding Output Plugins" to "Internals" chapter. It contains
> information to PostgreSQL developers.
Maybe, but I don’t have a strong opinion. If we decide to do it, it would
be better to make the change in a separate patch.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | PG Doc comments form | 2025-08-09 15:27:17 | Wrong Installation Link |
Previous Message | PG Doc comments form | 2025-08-08 05:14:56 | Removing publicly-writable schemas from search_path with ECPG |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2025-08-08 15:50:27 | Re: BackendKeyData is mandatory? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2025-08-08 14:01:05 | Re: BackendKeyData is mandatory? |