Re: Mark a reloption as indexterm

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Mark a reloption as indexterm
Date: 2019-04-12 03:33:45
Message-ID: CAHGQGwFvgZVMVKAZcrp1yw4i=Ds6T8Be2SsfJ=9PE-FhUcGmzg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 4:11 AM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On 2019-Apr-10, Fujii Masao wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'd like to propose to mark reloptions as indexterms, like GUC,
> > so that users can more easily search the pages describing
> > a reloption in document. Attached is the patch which does this.
> > Is this helpful? Thought?
>
> +1 for adding index entries to all reloptions. I'm not sure what you're
> achieving by splitting the text for some existing index entries in two
> and putting two words in the <secondary> that were part of the
> <primary>, though. I'd just put the whole text in <primary> (obviously
> the option name must be the first word of that).

Indeed. Attached is the updated version of the patch.

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao

Attachment Content-Type Size
reloption-doc-v2.patch application/octet-stream 18.2 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2019-04-12 03:52:29 Re: Mark a reloption as indexterm
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2019-04-12 01:48:46 Re: Clarification to pg_upgrade docs on reverting to old cluster