From: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Mark a reloption as indexterm |
Date: | 2019-04-12 03:33:45 |
Message-ID: | CAHGQGwFvgZVMVKAZcrp1yw4i=Ds6T8Be2SsfJ=9PE-FhUcGmzg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 4:11 AM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On 2019-Apr-10, Fujii Masao wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'd like to propose to mark reloptions as indexterms, like GUC,
> > so that users can more easily search the pages describing
> > a reloption in document. Attached is the patch which does this.
> > Is this helpful? Thought?
>
> +1 for adding index entries to all reloptions. I'm not sure what you're
> achieving by splitting the text for some existing index entries in two
> and putting two words in the <secondary> that were part of the
> <primary>, though. I'd just put the whole text in <primary> (obviously
> the option name must be the first word of that).
Indeed. Attached is the updated version of the patch.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
reloption-doc-v2.patch | application/octet-stream | 18.2 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2019-04-12 03:52:29 | Re: Mark a reloption as indexterm |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2019-04-12 01:48:46 | Re: Clarification to pg_upgrade docs on reverting to old cluster |