Re: Quorum commit for multiple synchronous replication.

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Sawada Masahiko <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Vik Fearing <vik(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Quorum commit for multiple synchronous replication.
Date: 2017-04-25 16:08:13
Message-ID: CAHGQGwFpEHuBe2AnV-9ntqKXOeqr80rh_+nmNPMwPOYH19P3gQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 5:41 PM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
<horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
> At Tue, 25 Apr 2017 09:22:59 +0900, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote in <CAD21AoAG88zYUwhV9L5muNX-qPSB+AgzerFDD0JDDVoM25gKKw(at)mail(dot)gmail(dot)com>
>> >> Please observe the policy on open item ownership[1] and send a status update
>> >> within three calendar days of this message. Include a date for your
>> >> subsequent status update.
>> >
>> > Okay, so our consensus is to always set the priorities of sync standbys
>> > to 1 in quorum-based syncrep case. Attached patch does this change.
>> > Barrying any objection, I will commit this.
>>
>> +1
>
> Ok, +1 from me.

Pushed. Thanks!

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rui Hai Jiang 2017-04-25 16:08:43 question: data file update when pg_basebackup in progress
Previous Message Tom Lane 2017-04-25 15:57:30 Re: Unportable implementation of background worker start