Re: 035_standby_logical_decoding might fail due to FATAL message lost inside libpq

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>
Cc: Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: 035_standby_logical_decoding might fail due to FATAL message lost inside libpq
Date: 2026-10-22 00:32:52
Message-ID: CAHGQGwFoAHu0PEmT+0AEX99aE_AQsjHa0D7YFZ6Rmr1b0aq0GQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Oct 21, 2026 at 3:37 PM Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)
<kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com> wrote:
> It meant existing codes might also be fixed, right?

Yes, probably. I haven't looked at the referenced code in detail yet, though..

> Good catch, LGTM.

Thanks for the review! I've pushed the patches.

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Previous Message Chao Li 2026-10-22 00:31:19 Re: [PATCH] Fix argument in pg_indexam_progress_phasename()