| From: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Sami Imseih <samimseih(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, shihao zhong <zhong950419(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Add missing stats_reset column to pg_statio_all_sequences view |
| Date: | 2026-03-16 10:01:47 |
| Message-ID: | CAHGQGwFcay_tX=7HSS=N=+Yd0FLEm2GrJgwxnqHM4wvxX0B=4g@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Mar 16, 2026 at 5:27 PM Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 13, 2026 at 11:52 AM Sami Imseih <samimseih(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> > > it would be better to verify that the stats of the specified sequence are
> > > actually reset by using pg_stat_reset_single_table_counters().
> > >
> > > Also, the documentation for pg_stat_reset_single_table_counters() should
> > > mention that it can reset sequence statistics as well.
> >
> > good points.
> >
> > For the documentation of pg_stat_reset_single_table_counters(), I also
> > mentioned materialized views for completeness.
>
> Thanks for updating the patch!
>
> I made a few cosmetic changes and pushed the patch. Thanks!
Hmm... buildfarm member crake reported a pg_upgradeCheck failure, and it seems
the test I added last time is causing it :(
--- /home/andrew/bf/root/HEAD/pgsql/src/test/regress/expected/stats.out
2026-03-16 04:27:05.805748763 -0400
+++ /home/andrew/bf/root/HEAD/pgsql.build/testrun/pg_upgrade/002_pg_upgrade/data/results/stats.out
2026-03-16 05:17:15.460202339 -0400
@@ -1196,7 +1196,7 @@
FROM pg_statio_all_sequences WHERE relname ='test_seq1';
?column? | ?column?
----------+----------
- t | 0
+ t | 1
(1 row)
The test assumed that blks_read and blks_hit in pg_statio_all_sequences would
be zero immediately after calling pg_stat_reset_single_table_counters().
However, on crake, either of them became 1 even right after the reset.
This might happen if another process (e.g., autovacuum) accesses
the sequence in the short window between the reset and the query of
pg_statio_all_sequences??? More investigation would be necessary.
Since checking the blks_read and blks_hit counters in pg_statio_all_sequences
can make the test unstable, I'm thinking of removing that part of the test.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2026-03-16 10:22:31 | Re: Flush some statistics within running transactions |
| Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2026-03-16 09:57:47 | Re: Don't use the deprecated and insecure PQcancel in our frontend tools anymore |