| From: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: incorrect handling of the timeout in pg_receivexlog |
| Date: | 2012-05-11 16:13:09 |
| Message-ID: | CAHGQGwFYAZzq5cwgKSssiHMUrGdDi7uEYgVeC1BqWL6tEaEt1Q@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 12:44 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
>> How common *is* it to have a build that doesn't have integer timestamps
>> these days? Does any of the binary builds do that at all, for example? If
>> it's uncommon enough, I think we should just go with the easy way out...
>
> +1 for just rejecting a mismatch.
Agreed.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2012-05-11 16:13:23 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Ensure age() returns a stable value rather than the latest value |
| Previous Message | Florian Pflug | 2012-05-11 15:55:24 | Re: Gsoc2012 idea, tablesample |