| From: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Rintaro Ikeda <ikedarintarof(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Yugo Nagata <nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>, Jakub Wartak <jakub(dot)wartak(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, "slpmcf(at)gmail(dot)com" <slpmcf(at)gmail(dot)com>, "boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com" <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Srinath Reddy Sadipiralla <srinath2133(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Suggestion to add --continue-client-on-abort option to pgbench |
| Date: | 2025-09-22 02:59:23 |
| Message-ID: | CAHGQGwFR_eZUMjigXdmJmB9o6CBH=CpLq4Wgbp2RxNTdaOrJJg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Sep 20, 2025 at 9:58 PM Rintaro Ikeda
<ikedarintarof(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com> wrote:
> The points you both raise make sense to me.
> Changing the macro name is not important for the purpose of the patch, so I now
> feel it would be reasonable to drop patch 0002.
Thanks for your thoughts! So let's focus on the 0001 patch for now.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | shveta malik | 2025-09-22 03:28:40 | Re: Clear logical slot's 'synced' flag on promotion of standby |
| Previous Message | Fujii Masao | 2025-09-22 02:56:31 | Re: Suggestion to add --continue-client-on-abort option to pgbench |