| From: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Zsolt Parragi <zsolt(dot)parragi(at)percona(dot)com> |
| Cc: | surya poondla <suryapoondla4(at)gmail(dot)com>, shihao zhong <zhong950419(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Antonin Houska <ah(at)cybertec(dot)at>, solai v <solai(dot)cdac(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: REPACK: warn about skipping foreign partitions |
| Date: | 2026-10-15 02:00:07 |
| Message-ID: | CAHGQGwFOwzAvgNpf9BGNq710-nZHOhJnmMomA1v_jDbEnKQPmA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Oct 15, 2026 at 7:33 AM Zsolt Parragi <zsolt(dot)parragi(at)percona(dot)com> wrote:
> Since (1) I think it's better if this thread doesn't depend on the
> outcome of the other and (2) I think the v4 version was overall
> simpler, I'm attaching the version of that with the original concerns
> fixed as v6. I thought a bit more about the performance question, but
> since we are already at the partitioned table code, it had to do the
> same iterations anyway, so it didn't make the indexed case better,
> even in theory.
Understood. Thanks for updating the patch! v6 looks good to me.
Barring any objections, I'll commit it.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Haibo Yan | 2026-10-15 02:01:43 | Re: Perf: Specialize ExecIndexOnlyScan() like ExecSeqScan() |
| Previous Message | ZizhuanLiu X-MAN | 2026-10-15 01:41:45 | Re: Optimize MCV stats for sortable types and utilize sorted-order properties |