| From: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> |
| Cc: | Daniel Gustafsson <dgustafsson(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pgsql: Revert online data checksum transitions |
| Date: | 2026-09-17 03:36:34 |
| Message-ID: | CAHGQGwFLNCA9nVHSsC_=G_mvsK_fAFb+QbJAL7=R9cK2PL9ZBQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Sep 16, 2026 at 8:08 PM Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se> wrote:
> Ugh, I thought I had tested everything but clearly missed this one. Will fix immediately when back from lunch.
Here are another comments:
data_checksum_version field in xl_checkpoint_redo struct should be removed?
Otherwise, it seems to be included in WAL records unnecessarily even though
it is no longer used. No?
- database (or on a shared object), or NULL if data checksums are
- disabled.
- </para></entry>
+ database (or on a shared object). Detected failures are not reset if
+ the <xref linkend="guc-data-checksums"/> setting changes. Clusters
+ which are initialized without data checksums will show this as
+ <literal>0</literal>. In <productname>PostgreSQL</productname> version
+ 18 and earlier, this was set to <literal>NULL</literal> for clusters
+ with data checksums disabled.
+ </para>
+ </entry>
...
- this database (or on a shared object), or NULL if data checksums are
- disabled.
+ this database (or on a shared object). Last failure is reported
+ regardless of the <xref linkend="guc-data-checksums"/> setting.
These updates to monitoring.sgml from commit f19c0eccae9 also should be
reverted? checksum_failures and checksum_last_failure seem to return
NULL again when data checksums are disabled, so their descriptions would
otherwise be incorrect.
checksum_enable_offline() and checksum_disable_offline() in
Cluster.pm also seem to be unused now. Should they be removed as well?
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2026-09-17 03:50:38 | pgsql: Distinguish publication exclusions in object addresses. |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2026-09-17 01:16:43 | pgsql: pg_plan_advice: Disallow partition name without partition schema |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Xuneng Zhou | 2026-09-17 03:41:43 | Re: WAIT FOR NO_THROW option could use some documentation |
| Previous Message | wenhui qiu | 2026-09-17 03:30:18 | Re: [PATCH v1] Optimize 64-bit atomic access on RV64 |