Re: pg_stat_statements: calls under-estimation propagation

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Sameer Thakur <samthakur74(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_stat_statements: calls under-estimation propagation
Date: 2013-09-18 17:41:28
Message-ID: CAHGQGwFGY+GuQSWyGjGksRxxHG3m-17hLrMKwQ+uYHS6_MxGTQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 2:41 PM, Sameer Thakur <samthakur74(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> >You seem to have forgotten to include the pg_stat_statements--1.2.sql
>>> >and pg_stat_statements--1.1--1.2.sql in the patch.
>>> Sorry again. Please find updated patch attached.
>
> I did not add pg_stat_statements--1.2.sql. I have added that now and updated
> the patch again.

Thanks!

I got the segmentation fault when I tested the case where the least-executed
query statistics is discarded, i.e., when I executed different queries more than
pg_stat_statements.max times. I guess that the patch might have a bug.

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2013-09-18 17:42:02 Re: dynamic shared memory
Previous Message Kevin Grittner 2013-09-18 17:39:04 Re: record identical operator