Re: Follow-up fixes for online wal_level change

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Follow-up fixes for online wal_level change
Date: 2026-07-16 23:46:29
Message-ID: CAHGQGwEkp1-1n5iC38+yHSNh955+KshwtCL6DzA0vk_vuUF_Eg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jul 16, 2026 at 9:10 AM Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> 0002 adds the logical decoding status stored in the checkpoint record
> to the pg_controldata output, which I found useful while investigating
> the above issue.

Should this status be exposed also by pg_control_checkpoint()?

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chao Li 2026-07-17 01:08:37 Re: Fix duplicate detection for null-treatment window functions
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2026-07-16 22:51:19 Re: Remove getpgusername()