| From: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> | 
|---|---|
| To: | Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> | 
| Cc: | heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org | 
| Subject: | Re: [BUG] Checkpointer on hot standby runs without looking checkpoint_segments | 
| Date: | 2012-04-18 17:02:24 | 
| Message-ID: | CAHGQGwEP+bvZcCn1QMkK1z5zAy0NAv=5d9_aYtMh5LGsC_h-DA@mail.gmail.com | 
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email | 
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers | 
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 10:22 AM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI
<horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
> I tried that at first. But I suppose the requirement here is 'if
> reading segments comes via replication stream, enable throttling
> by checkpoint_segments.' and WalRcvInProgress() seems fit to
> check that.
If so, what if replication is terminated and restarted repeatedly while
a restartpoint is running? It sometimes obeys and sometimes ignores
checkpoint_segments. Which seems strange behavior.
> Plus, adding SharedStartupStandbyMode into
> XLogCtlData seems accompanied with some annoyances which would
> not pay.
Hmm... what are you worried about? I don't think that sharing the variable
via XLogCtl is so difficult. Please see the code to share archiveCleanupCommand
from the startup process to the checkpointer. It looks very simple.
> By the way, do you have some advise about GetStandbyFlushRecPtr()
> and the order of the locations? I'm embarrassed with that...
Sorry. I could not parse this.... Could you explain this again?
Regards,
-- 
Fujii Masao
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2012-04-18 17:08:55 | Re: Bug tracker tool we need | 
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2012-04-18 16:53:17 | Re: [Devel 9.2] Index-only scan in count aggregation |