| From: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Karina Litskevich <litskevichkarina(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: doc: Improve description of io_combine_limit and io_max_combine_limit GUCs |
| Date: | 2025-11-07 07:44:49 |
| Message-ID: | CAHGQGwEMcMQL7uPS=Q4SfBpuvXYNUwSNgq5e9G0SaPAbng2LBg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Nov 5, 2025 at 10:59 PM Karina Litskevich
<litskevichkarina(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> * trace_connection_negotiation
> It is not documented at all. Should it be fixed?
Since other developer parameters like trace_* are already documented,
it seems good to also add trace_connection_negotiation to the docs.
I noticed that a patch for this was already proposed in [1], so it might be
better to revive that thread and review it there.
[1] https://postgr.es/m/CABV9wwPMuKfPf_u36hZmYmbnyZ9e8QvjSCO=EfeyrU+c+=xehA@mail.gmail.com
> I'm attaching these changes as a separate patch just in case. You can
> squash them if you like. Not sure what to do with the commitfest entry.
> Should I change it back to Needs review?
Thanks for the patches! I've pushed them and marked the CF entry as "Committed".
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2025-11-07 07:51:15 | Re: Extended Statistics set/restore/clear functions. |
| Previous Message | Kirill Reshke | 2025-11-07 06:25:59 | Re: transformJsonFuncExpr pathspec cache lookup failed |