Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, Beena Emerson <memissemerson(at)gmail(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2
Date: 2016-04-05 09:10:24
Message-ID: CAHGQGwEBpmD7M4e_-LiP8F47EwLrgat3naNqVuAErn=B3tSDNQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 6:45 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> On 2016-04-04 10:35:34 +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:
>> On 4 April 2016 at 09:28, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> > Barring any objections, I'll commit this patch.
>
> No objection here either, just one question: Has anybody thought about
> the ability to extend this to do per-database syncrep?

Nope at least for me... You'd like to extend synchronous_standby_names
so that users can specify that per-database?

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2016-04-05 09:12:35 Re: Yet another small patch - reorderbuffer.c:1099
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2016-04-05 09:09:39 Re: Support for N synchronous standby servers - take 2