Re: [HACKERS] Replication status in logical replication

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Vaishnavi Prabakaran <vaishnaviprabakaran(at)gmail(dot)com>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Replication status in logical replication
Date: 2018-03-29 20:37:47
Message-ID: CAHGQGwE2HgoZ=mjgMcvg9SO2zPDDr9d3tohcQwJvSt4Pri9MDw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 2:16 AM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On 16 January 2018 at 06:21, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 10:40:43AM +0900, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
>>> On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 12:43 AM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>>>> On 9 January 2018 at 04:36, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>>> We're not talking about standbys, so the message is incorrect.
>>>
>>> Ah, I understood. How about "\"%s\" has now caught up with upstream
>>> server"?
>>
>> +1.
>
> upstream is what I would have suggested, so +1 here also.
>
> Will commit.

ping?

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2018-03-29 21:18:14 Re: PostgreSQL's handling of fsync() errors is unsafe and risks data loss at least on XFS
Previous Message Fujii Masao 2018-03-29 20:26:30 Re: Enhance pg_stat_wal_receiver view to display connected host